The El Cobre project was spun out of Almaden Minerals as it was a bit overshadowed by Ixtaca. They've released some drill-results recently (here and here), which are either:
- Crap and deep or
- Deep and crap
- There is evidence of massive grade smearing from short, high-grade inconsistent type veins
- All the obvious targets have been drilled and hit nothing decent.
I'm also confused why Almadex are advertising this project as a 'new' discovery in their current presentation? El Cobre has been explored on and off since 1995 and 'new' project don't often have 35 holes (~7,000 m) drilled into several targets around the property.
We know that in the past there were different metal prices which can turn one exploration company's junk into another's treasure...
Wow, those are the best of the bunch? So basically 23 out of 35 holes hit anything that graded >0.1 g/t Au or >0/1% Cu. So 12 (about a third) hit nothing at all.
Overall, those intercepts are rubbish - 0.1% copper and ~0.2 g/t Au aren't very special! That's a green skid-mark, not a gold-rich copper porphyry deposit.
Did Kermit wipe his ass (and his gold-plated cock ring) on the drill-core?
This is what Blackadder thinks....
We'll ignore the old data and focus on the recent results.
They look pretty decent, abut when we sweep away the PR BS and look at the data in 3D we can quickly see that the thick moderate grade intervals dissolve away into a series of high-grade (relatively speaking), narrow zones surrounded by low grade crap.
Historic holes = yellow points; 2016 drilling = red points |
We know that in the past there were different metal prices which can turn one exploration company's junk into another's treasure...
nothing special here. |
Wow, those are the best of the bunch? So basically 23 out of 35 holes hit anything that graded >0.1 g/t Au or >0/1% Cu. So 12 (about a third) hit nothing at all.
Overall, those intercepts are rubbish - 0.1% copper and ~0.2 g/t Au aren't very special! That's a green skid-mark, not a gold-rich copper porphyry deposit.
Did Kermit wipe his ass (and his gold-plated cock ring) on the drill-core?
This is what Blackadder thinks....
We'll ignore the old data and focus on the recent results.
They look pretty decent, abut when we sweep away the PR BS and look at the data in 3D we can quickly see that the thick moderate grade intervals dissolve away into a series of high-grade (relatively speaking), narrow zones surrounded by low grade crap.
PR data
Some decent, thick intercepts |
Split apart assays
a bit different..... |
WTF! Where did all the grade go? However, I'm saving the best for last, drill-hole EC-16-008
ohh, you can't see the high grade zone? Let me zoom in a bit for you....
yup, 1.5m @ 109.5 g/t Au |
You can find a series of 3D views here (link), I've also included the geochemistry and geophysics for fun.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAscot's Premier project has some really good examples of spreading high grade out over wide intervals.
ReplyDeleteI'll have a look
DeleteAscot's Premier project has some really good examples of spreading high grade out over wide intervals.
ReplyDelete