- I was wrong and Orex are correct, the silver is horizontal, with an small lower zone of disseminated mineralisation (killing my idea of vertical feeders)
- A review of a couple of similar deposit suggest silver recoveries at Sandra in the upcoming metallurgical study will be around 50-60%.
- Is that too low for it to be mined?
- Probably, unless the deposit gets a lot larger (i.e. >100Moz Ag).
- It will be interesting what cut-off they will used for the resource calculations.
- 50 g/t lower cut-off to reflect the low recoveries
- 20 g/t cut-off to maximise the resources
- If the recoveries are crap, what is plan B for this project?
I'm going to revise my earlier idea. Originally I though that there were vertical feeder structures feeding int silver mineralisation into a horizontal porous unit (the rhyolite tuff). However, the new data indicates that it looks like there is a second, deeper silver zone. It is much narrower and lower grade, but Orex was right and I was wrong, the silver is horizontal.
|A narrow, lower grade silver zone at depth - hole 19 may not have completely drilled through the silver zone.|
|Is the silver zone open to the SW beyond hole 16-048?|
Basically the results from the 28th are in-line with earlier results, the high grade zones are slightly smaller than I originally thought.
We'll ignore the drilling for now, as I've been think more about the metallurgical study. It has been 3 months since Orex awarded the metallurgical testing contract to SGS Mineral Services, and we should be getting some news in the not too distant future.
However, I couldn't wait, I decided to do some research to see if I could find similar deposits with disseminated silver mineralisation and see what recoveries they got, so I could have a benchmark against which the Sandra results could be compared.
They say that all the best nuts come from California, and that also appears to be true for disseminated native silver deposits. In the foothills of the majestic Calico Mountains (check out the old mining town - link), nestled against the San Andreas Fault (yes that one) are the Waterloo (Pan Am Silver) and Langtry (Athena Silver) silver deposits.
There is SFA on Waterloo, but Athena released a 43-101 report on Langtry (link) outlining ~60Moz Ag, that included a section on the mineralogy (which minerals the silver is in), and results from several metallurgical studies.
MineralogyI managed to snag this image from a PhD done on the district.
The short answer - Crap - 50%-ish.
The long answer
Remember this data is NOT from Sandra, but from a deposit that appears to be similar. It shows that recovery in disseminated silver deposits can be low, require a lot of study and may need to crush the ore very fine or use relatively specialised/non-standard (i.e. more expensive) processing techniques to increase silver recoveries.
I'll put a mark down and say that Orex will get 55% silver recovery from cyanidation with a fine grind (-325 mesh).
This is just a guide, It will be interested to see how close we get.
For reference this website has some good info on different processing techniques (https://www.911metallurgist.com).
AG again points out how critical those recoveries are. A body needs an utter chitload of more ore when the recoveries get this stupid low. So, when the tards are tooting about everything EXCEPT their recoveries tis time to see WTF they are for dead certain.ReplyDelete
As an aside I'm not a fan of Co's that let their presentations get too old. After 3 months they no longer represent critical ongoing disclosure. After 6 months, well, WTF is going on exactly? Last from Orex Minerals Inc. - REX.v is May.
We'll see how long it takes! We know that the resource calculation will not be ready until the 3rd phase of drilling has been completed, and if the 'ore' is complicated it may require additional studies.ReplyDelete