tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post5289012742340044030..comments2024-02-05T00:42:53.074-08:00Comments on Angry Geologist: Sandy, can't you see I'm in misery?The Angry Geologisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04955645007432969022noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-47179629212302157682016-05-26T21:55:32.422-07:002016-05-26T21:55:32.422-07:00hahaha! digging for gold and silver is always fun ...hahaha! digging for gold and silver is always fun ;)Speculatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08684170280383716032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-48538393713520529382016-05-26T20:34:05.511-07:002016-05-26T20:34:05.511-07:00unfortunately my day job gets in the way! but it i...unfortunately my day job gets in the way! but it is a lot of fun (yes I and a sad individual) looking a new and different projects.The Angry Geologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04955645007432969022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-69961583102348814532016-05-26T20:22:18.027-07:002016-05-26T20:22:18.027-07:00I see. Will definitely keep that in mind in the fu...I see. Will definitely keep that in mind in the future.<br /><br />Hahah! Sounds good TAG, looking forward to more posts. Speculatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08684170280383716032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-58513527316332157182016-05-26T20:05:30.447-07:002016-05-26T20:05:30.447-07:00I think defining ~50Moz Ag (remember my 'resou...I think defining ~50Moz Ag (remember my 'resource' numbers are a guess) is excellent after only 6 months of drilling. The grade (again take with a fist of salt) is good for disseminated deposits<br /><br />I'll add Siribaya to my (ever increasing) list of project to look at!The Angry Geologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04955645007432969022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-75194097295914615722016-05-26T18:32:37.103-07:002016-05-26T18:32:37.103-07:00You are correct, the image from the Orex presentat...You are correct, the image from the Orex presentation I used to digitise the drill-holes was in UTM and I assumed (incorrectly) that it was ITRF-92 rather than NAD 27. I've updating the leapfrog views not and they will be uploaded later today.<br /><br />Thank you for bringing that to my attention, you sounds like someone who is familiar with the project!The Angry Geologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04955645007432969022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-56992985562687204712016-05-26T14:31:55.292-07:002016-05-26T14:31:55.292-07:00Hello AG.
I like your reference to the musical m...Hello AG. <br /><br />I like your reference to the musical movie "Grease".<br /><br />You have an interesting perspective on the drilling of the Sandra Escobar Project. It is nice to see people are interested in the project. Have you talked with the Orex geologists?<br /><br />I can help with a couple of items. I see that on the oblique perspective of the drill hole collars placed on the satellite image that they are plotted too far to the south and east. Holes SA-16-037 and 038 are drilled in the clearing, which has some trenching rock piles, and shows up in the photo.<br /><br />Holes SA-16-028 and 029, Cerro Chato Zone, are across the creek on the slope to the northwest, and not on the same slope as the Main Zone.<br /><br />All of the Main Zone drilling should be closer to the break in slope on the north side of the hill, which is where the mineralized horizon daylights.<br /><br />It looks like it may be a case of coordinate translation from NAD-27 to ITRF-92 UTM grids.<br /><br />There is more exploration planned for Sandra Escobar Project and more to be discovered.<br />The Happy Geologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11390316864273921033noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-75366299193249070492016-05-25T15:54:13.896-07:002016-05-25T15:54:13.896-07:00Great post as usual TAG! Just a couple of follow u...Great post as usual TAG! Just a couple of follow up questions:<br /><br />1) Assuming the deposit is indeed 49M oz Ag, would it be considered a big, average or small deposit? Also would 137 g/t for silver be considered high, average or low?<br /><br />2) Are you still open to look at other projects? If you are could you have a look at the Siribaya gold project of Merrex Gold JV with IAMGOLD?<br /><br />Cheers and thanks! Keeps the posts coming.Speculatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08684170280383716032noreply@blogger.com