tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post1231195929956660506..comments2024-02-05T00:42:53.074-08:00Comments on Angry Geologist: Making the gradeThe Angry Geologisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04955645007432969022noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-28146087967277335952018-08-12T20:12:54.112-07:002018-08-12T20:12:54.112-07:00Need To Boost Your ClickBank Commissions And Traff...<b>Need To Boost Your ClickBank Commissions And Traffic?</b><br /><br /><a href="http://www.bannerizer.com" rel="nofollow"><b>Bannerizer</b></a> made it easy for you to promote ClickBank products using banners, simply visit <b>Bannerizer</b>, and grab the banner codes for your chosen ClickBank products or use the <b>Universal ClickBank Banner Rotator</b> to promote all of the available ClickBank products.Bloggerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07287821785570247118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-88233396579533876282016-04-29T20:47:28.527-07:002016-04-29T20:47:28.527-07:00I agree with Picsou in that I don't understand...I agree with Picsou in that I don't understand why is it so wrong. I understand that a 0.8m wide vein is not mineable, so I think it is fair for them to expand it to something logical. I have heard 1m on either side or minimum 3m in total width is what a cut and fill mining method can do.<br /><br />If they were to spread it over 10m, then for sure it is misleading because you more into a different mining method (bulk mining).<br /><br />Is the issue that the true effective grade (i.e. grade net of recovery) for the low grade material is actually zero, so Royal Nickel should have weighted the 0.8m of 455.9 g/t with 1m on either side of material effectively grading 0 g/t to arrive at 455.9/(0.8 + 1 + 1)*0.8 = 130 g/t. 130 g/t seems pretty good worth 130/31.1 x 1200 = $5016 per tonne gross metal value.<br /><br />Hmmmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10147972784432092778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6272793377504221569.post-89616270135792002282016-04-29T19:52:36.937-07:002016-04-29T19:52:36.937-07:00Great blog initiative, thanks. While this reportin...Great blog initiative, thanks. While this reporting issue is not unheard of, would you mind explaining why exactly this is misleading, in this case and broadly speaking? Would have thought that as long as the vein is reasonably shaped over the extent of the deposit with no excessive mining dilution (which you won't know with just one hole!), that's ok. Or is it because the barren stuff can't be processed with the ore?Picsouhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08525259198791062890noreply@blogger.com